MUA Techniques


MUA techniques under anesthesia may vary from patient to patient as medical necessity indicates by the involved tissues and existing relative contraindications and/or possible complications that may exist. Some of the techniques include:


Soft tissue procedures - lateral stretching, linear stretching, deep pressure, traction and/or separation of muscle origin and insertion.


Tissue:

periarticular

Goals:

decrease muscle spasm and increase tissue mobility



Articulatory procedures (mobilization without impulse, low velocity techniques) - placing articulation through full anatomic range of motion. A passive serial repetitive oscillatory rhythmic springing force in the direction of restriction.


Tissue:

periarticular and articular

Goals:

increase quantity of motion - gradual movement of restrictive barrier to restore range of motion increase quality of motion - smooth range of movement with normal elastic and feel



Specific joint mobilization procedure - mobilization with impulse, high velocity technique. Extrinsic operator applied thrust overcoming restrictive articular movement. Engagement of the restrictive barrier and thrust through the barrier to achieve normal joint movement.


Tissue:

articular and intra articular

Goals:

increase joint range of motion reduce joint restrictions reduction of hyper tonicity stretch shortened fibrosed connective tissues of the articulation under anesthesia.

Home| How Procedure is Performed| Patients Who Are A Good Fit| MUA Effects| Indications| Patient Evaluation| MUA Techniques| Post Operative Care| MUA Results|

Supporting Studies/Great Results


There are several research studies about the effectiveness of manipulation under anesthesia, including:


1. 83% of 600 patients with EMG verified radiculopathies reported significant improvement - Robert Mensor, MD


2. Patients that had back pain for a minimum of 10 years reported an 87% recovery rate after MUA - 1987 with Ongly et al


3. 51% of patients with unrelieved symptoms after conservative care had been exhausted reported good to excellent results three years post MUA - Donald Chrisman, MD


4. 71% of 723 MUA patients had good results (return to normal activity relatively symptom free) and 25.3% had fair results (return to normal activity with slight residuals) and that flexibility, elasticity and range of motion can be restored following MUA - Bradford and Siehl


5. 83% of 517 patients treated with MUA responded well - Paul Kuo, MD professor of Orthopedic Surgery


6. Krumhansi and Nowacek reported on an MUA study done on 171 patients who experienced constant intractable pain for several months to 18 years. All of the patients of the study failed other conservative intervention. The results of the study showed that 25% of the patients had no pain, 50% were much improved with pain markedly decreased, 20% were better and could tolerate their pain but it interfered with work and recreation. Failures comprised 5% where there was minimal or no pain relief periods.

Send Us an Email
Request Additional Information